Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> I don't recognize anyone's "right" to enjoy someone else's privately owned property or, stated more honestly, to infringe upon the property rights of others.

There are those that do not recognize your "right" to exclude them from passing peacefully over land. Notably, in the real world, the FAA doesn't care one bit if you think you own your land. They will use the force of the federal government to let anyone fly a plane over your house (including at low altitude).

As a more extreme example, many indigenous people do not recognize your right to own land that was never sold.

Your principle doesn't really stand up well in the real world.

There are all sorts of exceptions to private property rights. People can legally come onto your land without your permission for all sorts of reasons (utility workers, aircraft overflying, government agents, police, private citizens who haven't been told not to, etc..) The 'right to roam' is just an extension of that, that says that if an undeveloped piece of land lies between where you are and where you need to go, you can pass over that land in a way that does not interfere with the landowner just like all the other exceptions to a landowners "exclusive" right to the land.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: