The question is whether current AI technologies represent any progress towards a true human equivalent artificial general intelligence. Most likely not, but no one knows for sure. If the answer turns out to be no then real progress will likely require theoretical insights from psychology, neuroscience, and other fields.
Fwiw, I don’t think we’re any closer to general intelligence then we were 5 years ago.
Other than that, I agree, especially since you added “and other fields.”
Psychology might eventually give us a useful definition of “intelligence,” so that’d be something.
Obviously all research can influence other areas of research.
