I suppose I'm not the intended audience since I don't have prerequisite knowledge of whatever the governance issue at hand is, but I read this and the linked statements and to me it all falls in the category of 'vagueposting'
Anyone want to break down what is at issue for the spectators?
> The Foundation board has unrepresentative composition relative to the community because, due to our count, all current members are cisgender, white-passing, men, one of whom has done military service, and one other (Eelco) likely relies on undisclosed military-tech work.
Anyone want to break down what is at issue for the spectators?