Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The scalper is trading volatility (they may or may not sell the ticket for a higher price) for the opportunity of a return. The venue is getting the opposite side of the deal. Guaranteed income now.



But if, on average, scalpers didn't get their payout, then they wouldn't take the risk right? Unless scalpers as a class are economically irrational?


> if, on average, scalpers didn't get their payout, then they wouldn't take the risk

The point is they can get their pay-out while the venue/artist and consumers win. Scalper gets paid. Venue and artist get stability. Consumer who buys from the scalper gets availability. And the other 90% of consumers get cheaper prices.


I see, I guess that makes sense in theory.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: