A person would have to have a quite flawed mental model of what GPS is to form the belief that it would stop working without data service, wouldn't they?
One of the interview questions where I work (we do automotive electronics) is "Explain how GPS works." It's directly relevant to the job, but it's also a neat opportunity to see how someone sizes up their audience, manages time and assumptions, etc.
All those things are neat, but mostly what I've learned is that quite a lot of people, otherwise apparently reasonably smart and competent and toting a whole stack of prestigious degrees, have ghastly flaws in their mental model of what GPS is.
I personally blame the rabid Libertarians that the other guy mentioned. Tons of people think that what GPS does is sends your location to the Air Force, which is a bit backwards (and doesn't pencil out in terms of either energy balance for the mobile station or channel capacity for the satellites). They think this because that's how people casually write about it (the FBI was tracking me over GPS, or whatever).
There's a difference between GPS vs A-GPS (Assisted GPS)[0][1].
Since A-GPS uses the cell tower to get the list of satellites in view, the GPS on some cellphones will keep working when cell service is lost but won't start working if cell service is unavailable.
I think this means my Samsung doesn't actually have GPS, since fallback to unassisted GPS has never worked for me (yes, I've tried waiting far longer than 15 minutes).
Maybe you can excuse a mental model that doesn't make the GPS vs A-GPS distinction, since A-GPS is often sold as GPS.
> I think this means my Samsung doesn't actually have GPS
Usually this just means that it has a weak antenna or catches too much noise, which isn't as much of an issue when assisted. It will probably work just fine unassisted under perfect conditions, but struggles otherwise. Apparently it's pretty common for modern phones, but there are exceptions.
absolutely, and most people do! I encourage you to go around asking your friends and family this question (without judgement, and see if you can prod them along to the right answer on their own!) i think the world is better when the average person has a more accurate understanding of the tools they use
(and contrary to popular belief, I think the average person is interested in understanding this, they're more motivated to understand things that actually matter to them, that are in their hands every day. A lot just have an emotional aversion to math due to bad school experiences, but they are genuinely curious)
Mostly in the same way the average person would assume "Hacker News" is anything but a place for SV investment bros to hang out and become rabid Libertarians.
Functionally on most devices losing network coverage renders GPS useless. I keep telling people to download OsmAnd if they want to be able to view maps on a plane or get home from their hike outside cell range. Google maps will try to cache maps to some degree nowadays but it tends to be very flakey and it seems to be very easy to accidentally get it to drop its cache when you're outside cell coverage.