Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> The two are fundamentally incomparable

You're not wrong. A paradigm shift is not an incremental change but a disruption of fundamentals.

> From my perspective the implications of this are dire.

These changes are scary, especially as people try to come to practical terms with the new reality.

> AI can completely remove the human element. The skill, creativity, and collaboration required to produce music is a big part of my appreciation for it.

I still hate autotune. I feel that it ruined music. But, on the other hand, it allowed people who were excellent musicians but terrible singers to make excellent music, even masterpieces. I don't think autotune was a paradigm shift really, but it was pretty disruptive.

People are deeply creative, social, collaborative, musical, artistic, hierarchical and status conscious. These traits will always drive people to make music and share it, and derive meaning from it. People will still pay other people for the music they make.

Photography utterly disrupted the social role that painters held as documentors. No one needed to hire a good painter to have a portrait. They could hire a photographer more cheaply for more accurate documentation. Artists working in the medium of painting really had to grapple with the question of what art is, if academic faithful representation of reality is no longer valued by society. Painting thus began to change. Impressionism led to Suprematism, Dadaism, Surrealism, Abstract Expressionism, Conceptualism, Modernism, Post Modernism.

Artists today will have to grapple with similar questions raised by AI generated art. But humans are creative, indomitable, curious and tenacious. I am absolutely excited to see the art that future human artists will make in the face of all of this.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: