> Furthermore, the app has been extensively RE'd by third parties to validate it's doing what it says on the tin.
thats a freaking lie and you should feel bad for repeating it.
it was barely reviewd years ago. before all the shady features that even caused the original founder to leave the company (and a few billions worth of golden handcuffs) with an open letter about how fb destroyed privacy in WhatsApp.
EU and all sane state actors forbid its use (some recommends signal)
all recent political leaks was from fb (e.g. brazil, italy)
> thats a freaking lie and you should feel bad for repeating it.
It's trivial to RE the app. Plenty of 3Ps continually RE the app.
Support your claims of WhatsApp being backdoored with facts, not random assertions you pull out of - where, exactly?
> EU and all sane state actors forbid its use
Because it is E2EE. You don't want government employees to use an E2EE service because it kills transparency.
> some recommends signal
WhatsApp and Signal share the same exact protocol.
> all recent political leaks was from fb (e.g. brazil, italy)
Irrelevant to WhatsApp. They're run by a completely separate team within Meta, have completely different leadership and reporting chains, and has a completely separate codebase and architecture.
Again, support your claims with actual facts instead of incoherent angry rambling. Is it backdoored? Can Meta access your messages? Provide proof.
thats a freaking lie and you should feel bad for repeating it.
it was barely reviewd years ago. before all the shady features that even caused the original founder to leave the company (and a few billions worth of golden handcuffs) with an open letter about how fb destroyed privacy in WhatsApp.
EU and all sane state actors forbid its use (some recommends signal)
all recent political leaks was from fb (e.g. brazil, italy)