Just pointing out that it was not really as novel as you seem to believe it was at the time it came out.
> Garbage collected but always native.
Ok, sure. There were no other native garbage collected languages. Ignoring history, this is true.
> No thread access, native channels and coroutines instead.
If we ignore history again, also new with Go.
> Defer is pretty much net new in language design terms.
I can't think of an equivalent in the form of syntax, so sure. This is a point to Go. It's a small change, but useful for flattening code.
> No while loop?!?
I don't know why the exclamation mark. They have one named type of loop with `for`, but they definitely have a while loop:
for x <= 10 {
...
}
That's a while loop, it's not an infinite loop, it's not a do-while loop. That they reduced their looping constructs to one name (and then determine which actual loop kind by what's between `for` and `{`) does not mean they actually removed while loops. This does simplify the syntax, maybe.
> “If err != nil”!!?
[edit: missed this one]
if (some_c_lib_fun(...) == -1) {
// check the errno
}
defer is best compared to try/finally or unwind-protect and friends. You can defer any action, not just whatever the IDisposable happens to cleanup. It also gets access to the lexical scope for its deferred actions.
You could imitate that with IDisposable, but it would be overkill compared to just using finally (in C#).
> Garbage collected but always native.
Ok, sure. There were no other native garbage collected languages. Ignoring history, this is true.
> No thread access, native channels and coroutines instead.
If we ignore history again, also new with Go.
> Defer is pretty much net new in language design terms.
I can't think of an equivalent in the form of syntax, so sure. This is a point to Go. It's a small change, but useful for flattening code.
> No while loop?!?
I don't know why the exclamation mark. They have one named type of loop with `for`, but they definitely have a while loop:
That's a while loop, it's not an infinite loop, it's not a do-while loop. That they reduced their looping constructs to one name (and then determine which actual loop kind by what's between `for` and `{`) does not mean they actually removed while loops. This does simplify the syntax, maybe.> “If err != nil”!!?
[edit: missed this one]
> Calling the evolution boneheadedI didn't. Why are you putting this here?