> Companies with lower parasite load operate more efficiently, allowing higher production of goods and services for lower price, leading to a wealthier society.
This may be true. But I think it would be wise to consider an alternative:
Companies with lower parasite load operate more efficiently, allowing higher extraction of wealth from society at large to the owners and leaders of the company, leading to a more unequal and poorer society.
Probably not all companies are in the second way, but to think all are in the first way sounds naive to me.
> The alignment problem may actually be the hardest problem we have.
Hah, reading this makes me think you already understand that your assertion about companies operating efficiently is false. Yet you wrote it...
> Companies with lower parasite load operate more efficiently, allowing higher extraction of wealth from society at large to the owners and leaders of the company, leading to a more unequal and poorer society.
Only in a non-competitive environment where there are substantial barriers to entry. While this may describe many corporations I suspect it describes very few tech companies (Meta, Alphabet, Amazon and a dozen others perhaps).
> Hah, reading this makes me think you already understand that your assertion about companies operating efficiently is false.
This may be true. But I think it would be wise to consider an alternative:
Companies with lower parasite load operate more efficiently, allowing higher extraction of wealth from society at large to the owners and leaders of the company, leading to a more unequal and poorer society.
Probably not all companies are in the second way, but to think all are in the first way sounds naive to me.
> The alignment problem may actually be the hardest problem we have.
Hah, reading this makes me think you already understand that your assertion about companies operating efficiently is false. Yet you wrote it...