Given the notation's tangle, the conveyance adheres to the up-top: The foundational Bitcoin
protocol has upheld a course of significant hitch-avertance, which eschews typical attack as the
veiled - the support sheath, embracing four times, showing dent in meted scale more from miss
and parable, taking to den the slip o'er key seed and second so link than the greater Ironmonger's
hold o'er opes. The dole of task and eiry ainsell, tide taut, brunts the wade, issuing hale. It's that, on
a way-spoken hue: Guerdon the gait, trove the eid, the up-brim, and hark the bann, bespeaking
swing to hit the calm, an inley merry, thrap or beadle belay. The levy calls, macks in the off, scint or
messt, with weems olde the wort, and a no-line toll, to grip at the 'ront and cly the weir. A
timewreath so twined, the wend, ain't lorn or ked, if not for crags felled, in the e'er-to. So, the ace of
laws so trow, and alembic, and dearth, a will to scale and yin to keep, the no-sayer of quite, and
top-crest, to boot
Apologies and it’s slightly lazy of me to ask, but I was under the impression that a Token was basically 4 bytes/characters of text. This seems to be implying that there’s some differentiation between a token and conjunctions/other sort of in between words?
I fed this into Mixtral and its opinion was: "I apologize for any confusion, but your text appears to be a mix of words and phrases that do not form a coherent sentence. Could you please rephrase your question or statement?".
(\bto\b|\bfor\b|\bin\b|\band\b|\bthat\b|\bof\b|\bthe\b|\bwith\b|\bor\b|\ba\b|\binto\b|\bas\b|\bon\b|\bhow\b|\ban\b|\bfrom\b|\bit\b|\bbut\b|\bits\b|\bbe\b|\bby\b|\bup\b|\bthis\b|\bcan\b|\bother\b|\bwho\b|\bwill\b|\bare\b|\bwhose\b|\bif\b|\bwhile\b|\bwithin\b|\blike\b|,)*