Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

If you’re the one quoting Wikipedia and have knowledge that the data you quoted is incorrect, with source and everything, it’s kind of on you to update the article.



This logic doesn't track for me.

I proposed the case where I believe the current Wikipedia entry to be true.

Wouldn't the person who believes the contrary case be the best person to update the wiki?




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: