Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That would benefit from various subsidies; from the article it _looks_ like the $54/MWh projected figure is before subsidy.



Subsidies would be useful in getting it from $108/MWh to $54/MWh faster, but they don't change the underlying physics of the technology.


Sorry, what I mean is that the $48/MWh figure benefits from significant subsidy; it's not a realistic cost of provision.


Perhaps surprisingly, it is a realistic cost and could be much lower if the electricity market were efficient (as opposed to being an amalgam of regional monopolies with essentially no price incentives).




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: