> In the first Patlabor movie E. Hoba, the author of the Labor virus, graduated from MIT, and one or two mentions were made of efforts by people at MIT to eradicate the virus.
Reminds me of the time I wrote RMS an email telling him he should watch that, as a parable on the importance of using free software in public-works infrastructure. He said it looked really good but that he'd have to try to find a copy on VHS.
I love how I know RMS = Richard M Stallman, but my brain always auto expands it to Root Mean Squared first. Definitely up there in the divine rankings of the three letter acronyms of old.
For whatever reason, I've always associated the acronym "RMS" with Stallman. (Even though I have no idea what the "M" in his name is.) I then immediately think of the famous "Stallman Jesus" photo.
In the '90s (or early 2000's?), I remember seeing a photo of Stallman Jesus on the left arrayed against Bill Gates on the right, with Stallman being the figurehead for the open-source coalition arrayed against the might of Microsoft. I've not been able to find that photo since though.
For some reason, I immediately thought "Milhous" when I read the parent comment, and then after seeing your response, it took me a moment to realize that somehow got confused with Richard Nixon.
Of course he should, but I was attempting to make a joke, since I thought that the parent comment was also a joke (word play on two meanings of the word "mean").
I think the point is that places exist for jokes that don't add anything, so we can just go do that there, rather than changing the definition of what this is
Because he built his career on "freedom" advocacy? Doesn't he support pirating ebooks? Didn't he plagiarize, then just copy, emacs source? Turnabout's fair play.
i found the Gavin Belsome (sp?) character interesting in Silicon valley when i first saw him because he was noticeably more dominant than the previous role I saw the actor in American Psycho. Same with the Aviato guy versus his previous sidekick role in Deadpool.
A lot of the truly-good actors get called character actors and are considered less important than less-versatile leads. And of course sometimes (often, perhaps) leads are good, versatile actors but every director keeps demanding the same, proven-bankable performance out of them. You see this with someone like Adam Sandler, who plays the same couple easy-to-play characters in most of his movies that make him serious money, but can absolutely act when he needs to (which is mostly in movies that don't make him serious money).
IMO Brad Pitt is an example of a "leading man" who's actually at his best in character-actor type roles. He never quite developed that reliable-draw narrow tyepcasting that defines a lot of leads (Reynolds and Pratt are prime examples—you cast them in a big-budget movie for a specific reason, like, there's little question what sort of character they're gonna play) and seems more at ease as a rather offbeat lead or as a supporting character.
There are hundreds of thousands of professional actors in the world. Very few of them are able to get away with playing the same character, because that rarely pays the bills.
But for a few select leading actors, playing the same character in different films (mostly, action flicks) allows them to create generational wealth.
For those unfamiliar with Touhou, the main character of this video is a human girl who turned herself into a magician (they are considered a different species in series lore) through intense study and practice of magic. As an outsider, I imagine that successfully working through SICP is a similar experience.
MIT somehow has the best esprit de corps around. I went to a little nowhere college, and managed to get into an R1 Uni for my doctorate, but I'll never have the feeling of "That's my place!" that it seems like these guys do.
It’s a transformational place, with both enormous hard work (so you feel a sense of relief when you get out) and at the same time much more of an opportunity to do “real” things.
At an institution where teaching is important there’s more “infrastructure” for it so you can manage to be exposed to less of the research side. At MIT research is most of the institute’s activity, so you get to be part of significant and/or obscure work if you want, and most do.
Plus, as I like to joke, that “if you aren’t arrogant when you get there, MIT will beat it into you”.
One thing that has kept me from ever returning to MIT (where I did my PhD) is that I don't think I could bear the feeling of loss that I am sure would overwhelm me when confronted with the sights and smells and memories of that period of my life that I can never go back to live again. I have lived in quite a few different places during my life, and have pleasant memories from all of them, but my time at MIT feels completely different - it's not just memories, but it feels much more personal, as if it's not just a place but represents who I really am. I have often wondered whether everyone feels like that about their PhD years, but your comments seems to suggest that it is not universal.
I also went to MIT for a PhD: 2009-2015. Definitely around 2012ish was the most memorable: in particular the simple stuff like walking down mass ave from central every morning, stopping by Flour bakery for an oatmeal + egg sandwich, going to LaVerdes for snacks, Anna's for burritos. Staying in office til 10pm messing around with research, then taking no 1 bus (or often red line from kendall) back to central, rinse and repeat. That IAP of Jan 2012 was really nice too, was able to dabble a bunch in really interesting stuff like painting classes and such.
University of Chicago did have an excellent spirit of nerdiness throughout the 80s-90s. Don't know how well its retained it through the recent changes and rankings improvement they've gone through, but I hope so.
Related to that, the "Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs" book is quite often featured as the go-to programming book in manga, creating the meme of the anime girl holding a copy of SICP.
I'm not so sure I'd want the distinction, since the American division was the one that produced an angel-infected Eva that (almost?) got a pilot killed.
Regarding the knights of the eastern calculus, what is this phrase they are referring to?
> What probably happened is two independent sets of people were inspired by a cool phrase from hacker lore (given LISP’s long-time popularity at MIT, it’s reasonable to suppose that the phrase may have originated here).
It’s a joke about the Knights of the Lambda Calculus, itself a Sussman joke on things like the Knights of Malta or the Knights of Columbus. Even in the SICP days of 6.001 not everyone outside MIT AI & LCS considered lisp or the lambda calculus relevant to the “real world”, whatever that is.
I can say that, at least back in the year 2003, it was quite popular in Japan to wear MIT branded sweatshirts. Even for people who did not watch anime. I'm not sure if that's just a trend or a persistent style.
MIT is really good at branding itself as the place for smart people to do stuff.
The height of the cliche imo is Half Life 1's intro sequence. The only info you get about Gordon Freeman is that he is a young PhD graduate from MIT with a specialization in theoretical physics. It was a "this guy is the smartest guy around" line.
Being adjacent to MIT, the inflated egos are very exhausting. It's the top reason I would avoid working for them. That and academia is toxic with half market rate pay.
From my own (possibly limited) anime viewing experience, the US surprisingly doesn't feature as a setting in anime quite that often, in fact, I've seen more K-dramas set in the US than anime.
Instead it's countries like UK and Germany that I feel have far more of a presence in anime settings. Not sure why that is the case.
Japan had close relationship with differnt European countries, before USA was having any official contact. So for historical settings, these countries are maybe more familiar.
For worlds timed to circa 1000 - 500 years, US was pretty different from Europe.
Also remember close ties between Japan and Germany during certain war.
Not sure about within anime, but back in our fleshy human realm, Crunchyroll was founded by Berkeley graduates and is now the go-to anime platform. I suppose if you can't beat 'em, join 'em?
If you're the kind of person with a folder full of files, you might try something like
find . -name '*.mkv' -o -name '*.mp4' | while read -r f ; do if ffmpeg -hide_banner -loglevel error -txt_format text -i "$f" -f srt - | grep -Ei 'Stanford|Berkeley|Caltech' ; then echo "# found in ${f}" ; fi ; done
> I believe MIT has strong prominence in Asia is mainly due to its proximity to Harvard.
I don’t know that that is true — when my parents decided to visit the US for a couple of years in the late 60s my Indian grandfather apparently said that I would end up at MIT.
At that point I was just a little kid with no bias for science vs arts, but apparently didn’t consider Harvard relevant, even though one of his brothers was a diplomat and another a literature prof and he himself surely would have heard of the place.
(I’m glad my parents didn’t tell me this “prophecy” until long after I graduated as I did end up going back and attending MIT!)
> Caltech is too obscure. Stanford starts gaining provenance with Silicon Valley Internet tech bros I believe.
Caltech is much smaller than MIT. It’s true that Stanford was still not well known outside the western US into the early 80s, but its global prominence increased significantly long before those “tech bro” carpetbaggers showed up — the causality runs the other way.
Reminds me of the time I wrote RMS an email telling him he should watch that, as a parable on the importance of using free software in public-works infrastructure. He said it looked really good but that he'd have to try to find a copy on VHS.