Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Is it really unreasonable for a photographer to have a higher standard of "good enough"?

Anyway, his point is that JPEG was already "good enough", and WebP is not actually "good" for his purposes despite claims that it's better than JPEG for all purposes.




His claim is too broad. Why not serve RAW files? For the real enthusiasts


Because you wouldn't see the difference in quality while the size difference would be huge




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: