Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I always zoom in on pictures on the web to see if the compression is good or if there are artifacts.



I agree, it's not a good example to lead with.

That said, in the context of showing off your photography I can understand considering these kind of artifacts undesirable, even though they're perfectly fine for a lot of other uses. On my own website I spent quite some time downgrading my mugshot to be as small as possible without too many artifacts – it's now 4.9K in WebP, vs. 9.2K in JPEG before. Maybe that was a tad obsessive though...

I do think the author doesn't quite appreciate that most people are not photographers, and that for most images quality doesn't actually matter all that much.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: