I don't really understand your expectations here. You seem to disagree with someone else and they won't reply to you to give you evidence of their claims. What do you hope to accomplish by replying to me?
I replied to pjmlp because I thought (and still think) he was wrong in his characterization that WASM is a failure because it doesn't magically make insecure C programs secure.
I replied to you because I thought (and still think) you were wrong and/or misunderstanding what pjmlp was saying.
I can disagree with two people at the same time. I don't see the issue.