Given that this version from the NYT is very different from the one in the post, and far more reasonable in its requirements, it makes it even more apparent that the linked product is a scam.
Exaggerating details the way the linked post does is one of the major red flags of almost every scam. Especially dangerous is the way it attempts to make the regulator the enemy based on a fraudulent retelling of actual events.
Exaggerating details the way the linked post does is one of the major red flags of almost every scam. Especially dangerous is the way it attempts to make the regulator the enemy based on a fraudulent retelling of actual events.