Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Deadbolt companies aren't liable for customers leaving their products unlocked, right? Is this so different?



That makes sense to me but I'm not sure your average judge/juror would see it so simply--especially given that in most cases it'd be a lot easier to tell if/when a deadbolt has been modified.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: