If you want to be acknowledged as a scholar, then act like one instead of making suspicious statements about your opponents' demographics. It has been discussed ad nauseam at this point that the article provides a history lesson, but the suggestions are illogical or unactionable. It is just not that interesting or relevant.

Where do I make a statement about my (your words) opponents demographics ?

I don’t really see substance in your statements just accusations, vagueness and attempts to shut the dialogue.

Someone wronged wants justice we don’t shut the conversation because it’s boring to you (assuming good intentions). No one is forcing you to participate.

I regret giving your words the benefit of the doubt.

You said the quiet part out loud with the "people from former colonial powers" comment. Take it easy.

>The submission is about a colonial power (uk) forcibly relocating the occupants of those Islands

No, the submission was about establishing a very tenuous connection between said horrible acts and the existence of a very specific TLD. Then essentially making the claim that everybody who uses said TLD is an evil monster who is actively supporting genocide while everybody who doesn't use said TLD is a shining example of saintly righteous purity who has demonstrated that they are genuinely morally outraged at historical injustices.

I don't own an .io domain so therefore I am morally superior. And I didn't even have to lift a finger in order to earn that claim to virtue.