I'm arguing that in the US doctors can prescribe all medications regardless of their specialty (because it's true) and that it's not always a good idea, for example if the doctor is not familiar with recognizing the side effects which are outside of his specialty. (because that's also true) Your shrink is not going to prescribe you statins, as an example, but they could. It's important for a GP to recognize depression, but that doesn't mean they should treat depression, just as they should not give you a heart transplant.
You're arguing like something as at stake for you or you have bone to pick, I'm saying very generic anodyne things, i'm arguing for sober reasonableness.
We are talking about SSRIs here, not highly addictive substances. They're among the most prescribed drugs worldwide, I can guarantee you a GP knows very well how they work. Comparing that to a heart transplant is absurd.
> I'm saying very generic anodyne things, i'm arguing for sober reasonableness
You're saying vague things that are roughly as controversial as "water is wet" when read literally, but are out of place and tone-deaf in the context of above discussion.
You're arguing like something as at stake for you or you have bone to pick, I'm saying very generic anodyne things, i'm arguing for sober reasonableness.