Thanks, camiller :-) This just got interesting for me to dig deeper.

Probably all stories about these negative bills should carry photos and profiles of who's who in the league. If it's about transparency enforcement then the sword should sweep in both the directions.

That's fair to ask, I believe, especially from chairs that are funded from taxpayers money.

For what it is worth, you can also read the text of the bill there. Having done so (it is only 11 pages), I'm not convinced this is a "negative" bill.