This is a land value tax, not a building value tax. So essentially the exact opposite of what you say. It would solve the french problem.
With an LVT they would be taxed identically regardless of if their building is in pristine shape or falling to shambles. Meaning there is now no longer any incentive to let the building rot.
With an LVT they would be taxed identically regardless of if their building is in pristine shape or falling to shambles. Meaning there is now no longer any incentive to let the building rot.