Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This argument around cost of fake content would be more convincing if it weren't already used countless times throughout history. Socrates saying that writing will atrophy people's memories. The priest's fear that books will replace them when it comes to preaching. Gessner and his belief that the unmanageable flood of information unleashed by the printing press will ruin society.

The social dilemma, and all those that were convinced social media would spell the end of modern society.

Instead each of these technologies improves access to information and makes it easier for most to determine the truth via multiple sources. I'd imagine in the future there will be many AI agents that can help to summarize the many viewpoints. Just like anything, don't trust any one of them in isolation, consider many sources, and we'll be fine.




> I'd imagine in the future there will be many AI agents that can help to summarize the many viewpoints. Just like anything, don't trust any one of them in isolation, consider many sources, and we'll be fine.

It would be promising if there were any formal theories proposing any such methods of verification. However, I'm presently aware of none.

Instead, we see AI detection methods failing and AI cyber defense failing at present.

“As cybercriminals are turning to AI to create more advanced malicious tools, a separate report by the web security company Immunefi said cybersecurity experts are not having much luck with using AI to fight cybercrime”

https://decrypt.co/150899/wormgpt-fraudgpt-ai-hackers-phishi...

I will have a different opinion when we see some real solutions being proposed or implemented. If you have some references in that regard, let me know.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: