Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The fact that it's big doesn't matter. Building a million homes in North Dakota won't help anyone.

People need to live near cities, where jobs are. Outside our privileged white collar world where remote work is easy, others need to live in metro areas.

We need to build in and near cities, and improve the transit infrastructure.




We also need to create cities, and revitalize dying ones. There are many small towns in the US and Canada where I'd love to buy a house, but they all tend to suffer from the same terminal decline pattern: crumbling infrastructure, lack of opportunities, and a single WalMart supplying everyone while choking out all other business.


I sometimes daydream about building a city, just one, that prioritises cycling and walking over cars.

If you like cars, you can literally live everywhere else.


In NA there's pretty much only Montreal


Let’s build a second city for those who prefer not to have cars dominate. :)

I guess the question is if that alone is enough of a selling point to form a city.

And then, the issue is always how you prevent the nimbys from taking over once the first batch of housing has been built.


"Build more houses" was meant as a shorthand for "Upzone cities".




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: