Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> That idle timeout was pretty important when AOL cost $1/hour

Let me guess: are you American?

Brit here. Our phonecall connection charges were a lot more than that. The ROTW pays for local calls as well as long-distance. $1/hr would have been great. I paid closer to $1/min for dial-up. We all used OLRs: Offline Readers. An app that dials your service provider, posts all outgoing messages, grabs all new messages into a file, zips it, downloads it and any pending file downloads, then hangs up.

They were great and all message reading was local, hence fast: no lag at all, even on 14.4kb/s.

But CI$ ones were rubbish and AOL didn't have one at all, 'til it went toll-free in about 1998.

I am still liamproven@aol.com to this day.




TIL that Brits used America Online.


AOL UK launched in 1996. My account is a journalist's complimentary one from back then.

It was a worldwide service which is why it rebranded as "AOL".

I don't really use it any more, but one of its half a dozen alternate account names is still my mother's primary email address.


I’m sure we fairly quickly (as in fairly quickly after 56k became a thing) had zero call rate ISPs who just charged a small monthly. We used to use FreeUK (eventually taken over by Clara), and had a second line dedicated to it.


Yes, it did come, you're right.

It was about 15 years or so after the BBS boom in the USA, though, which was driven by free local calls.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: