People are ostensibly downvoting you because you're baselessly linking porn to "population collapse."
Plenty of people think that porn is bad or, more weakly, that it's a mild social ill that requires counter-education to help (mostly) young men understand that porn isn't the same thing as a healthy adult relationship. You can believe these things without catastrophizing.
It seems to be entirely possible that someone can simultaneously believe that porn is bad and that the government should have no particular insight into whether you watch it.
I'm not a libertarian. It's just a pointless, wasteful, and manifestly stifling incursion on something that needs social education (much like booze, you're never going to kill porn).
Please read comments charitably. This site has rules to that effect.
Social education means that the government should commit funds and other resources to educating the public (especially young men) about the un-reality of pornography and its insufficiency as a substitute for normal human intimacy. This is what other developed countries do[1].
Edit: and note: this is an obviously non-libertarian position to hold.
I don't watch that much porn anymore, but we still sometimes put a Dorcel (or any 'porn with plot' movie) to get in the mood, especially in winter. I think it's a positive in my sexual life.
Anyway, this is clearly government overreach. I'm not against age verification but it has to be an anonymous system. Privacy is worth fighting for.
