> The mere existence of competitors does not preclude antitrust action.
Agreed. I just don't see the anti-competitive behavior around virtual desktops that we did with WinOS and IE, so I think it would be a very tough sell.
What are the reasons to favor one specific vendor giving it a key advantage over the other? Microsoft seems to be clearly playing favorites here. What are they trying to do? Give a monopoly to their favorite vendor? Is it legal to use your monopoly to expand someone else's? Can we really call this company, with its seemingly deep and strong ties to Microsoft, a separate entity? If it's not, this is clearly something the DoJ should look into.
Agreed. I just don't see the anti-competitive behavior around virtual desktops that we did with WinOS and IE, so I think it would be a very tough sell.