Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> on average over the year

Thing is, industries don't operate on "average energy". Neither do services and people's homes. They don't care if you have 100% energy tomorrow if today you get 0%. Yes, on average you will get 50%. But in practice you'll have complete disruption.

When the sun is down, it's down not just for a singe country or a city. When the wind is not blowing, it's not just a local phenomena for a single country/city. Etc.

> the actual number for PV is about 10%, and even given that capacity factor the world is currently on the path to that alone being sufficient by the early 2030s.

So, riddle me this: if you want to account for days when wind and electricity produce only 1-3% of their installed capacity, how much capacity (and storage) needs to be installed to provide full energy needs?

> That's like saying your car is "currently" only as fast as a bicycle

False analogy

> And if everyone running the grid were to say "we're not having a grid any more", Kaufland and Obi both sell kWh-range battery packs at low enough prices that, given the way they wear over use, they'll already be cheaper over their lifetime.

How many of those battery packs you will need for "no grid"?

> hence why it's not common, but it is already there.

Of course it's nowhere near "there", wherever there may be.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: