Yep, but would that have been so bad? Certainly with IPv6's 128-bit addresses, there would still be enough space to go around…
Though admittedly, when I see "IPv4 with more bits" hypotheticals, they often involve smaller addresses than IPv6.
Yep, but would that have been so bad? Certainly with IPv6's 128-bit addresses, there would still be enough space to go around…
Though admittedly, when I see "IPv4 with more bits" hypotheticals, they often involve smaller addresses than IPv6.