Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

On the other hand, this shows GFW authors are more, and more considerate of the collateral damage, which is a surprise. It seems GFW has indeed became good enough to frustrate casual users to trigger uproar when windows update, or AWS ip ranges go belly up, or something.

VPN authors should chose the maximum collateral damage strategy to frustrate GFW authors, make China as close as possible to completely cutting off outside internet. No need to completely evade fingerprinting, instead, do the complete opposite, and try to mimic common protocols, and critical applications as much as possible.




From my understanding, this is what TOR did for some time. They tried to make it look as close as possible to HTTPS.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: