If you go back and read what I said, I said:

> what is the evidence either of them is a "nazi sympathizer"?

That's not denying anything. That's simply asking what the evidence is.

When asking what the evidence for an assertion is gets the response:

> This is not good faith, and screams as neonazi apologism.

I don't think we are engaging in rational discussion any more. Continued engagement is pointless.