Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The blogger might be an ignorant, but the OP post doesn't reassure me. If I go in a 5 months travel doing consulting abroad, and I'm living alone; who guarantee that my car is being constantly put on the charger? There are many cases (plug dysfunction, electric problem...) and $40K is not a trivial amount.



I'm sure a reliable person could be located to look in on such a parked vehicle once or twice. Especially if they are offered a couple hundred a pop to do it.

If such batteries become prevalent, I would think that monitored charging garages and bonded maintenance services will spring up.


Did you read the article? It stated that not charging the the car WILL NOT lead to $40,000 bricking.


Where did it say that? It acknowledges that deeply discharging may damage the cells, and it does not refute that it would cost $40,000 to fix.

Even the owner's manual state this (except for the $40,000 cost of course).


quote from the article:

Another error on the part of the blogger is the claim that if the cars discharge fully, the battery packs will be damaged. This is blatantly false. The battery management system of the Tesla Roadster keeps the battery from being discharged to a damagingly low state of charge under normal driving conditions. It's true that a full discharge to zero percent state of charge can potentially be damaging to a battery. However the battery management system of the Roadster won't allow the car to reach that low level of charge.


However the battery management system of the Roadster won't allow the car to reach that low level of charge.

This is just plain wrong. If the car is not charging, self-discharge will happen and nothing can stop it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: