The title is as you quoted it, and no it's not in the slightest accurate. Amazon is not doing something because of a blog, as I told you: It's because California is calling him as a witness.

Implying the blog had anything to do with it is simply a lie.

Wasn't he called as a witness because of the blog?

He wasn't "called", i.e. involuntary, rather he was hired as a witness, i.e. they are paying him, and he could say no if he wanted to.