Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I just talked to other kids and we pooled money to buy the book and then photocopy it. It was rampant piracy. I think we might have then either sold the book (likely) or returned it (unlikely) after photocopying it.

It taught me that there are limits to my ethics. Knowing full well that I am violating a social contract that many others are abiding by, I still did it. If I can act on this particular line, then it's just a matter of degree between me and those who more egregiously violate our shared rules.

After all, we had a massive advantage against kids who worked hard to afford the books. Even if they made $15/hr (outrageous), they would still have spent 10 hours on that book alone.




Violating shared rules does not necessarily make one less ethical. If the rule itself is unethical then it can even make one more ethical.


I'm not sure whether I agree or not, but as a reference point, Socrates comes to mind - should he have stolen off with Crito instead of taking the hemlock?

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-ethics-shorter/#12




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: