Ok. I'm not sure how this happened, but I think the dataset was somehow mislabeled. It appears that this dataset is the Q1 version, not the latest Q2. Can you please try re-downloading it?
We're probably going to have to make an public announcement about this...
269708: London
124059: Paris
113135: New York
99314: São Paulo
75428: Los Angeles
69691: Madrid
67328: Toronto
63738: Dubai
63456: New Delhi
I would not have expected São Paulo to come fourth in this list, after New York but in front of Los Angeles. I just learned it's the 4th largest city in the world https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_cities - after Tokyo, Delhi, Shanghai - but I guess it has much more of a representation on LinkedIn than those other cities.
I've been working through this issue a lot lately. There tend to be two camps, the "Make the experience good for the person trying to access the data, because good relationships are more important than the ability to contact someone" versus "Why should I give someone something for free when there is zero chance I can ever make a sale to that person?"
I think the main listing for Google is this one (as an example):
10361050:company/google,Public Company,Google,goo.gle,,Software Development,"search, ads, mobile, android, online video, apps, machine learning, virtual reality, cloud, hardware, artificial intelligence, youtube, and software","10,001+",Mountain View,California,US