Wikipedia is quite amazing in terms of that social collaboration he is talking about.
For example, during the recent pentagon leaks I was watching that Wikipedia page evolve day by day. It was much more interesting and faster than any news org covering the issue. Plus it was quite diverse.
1. Cuz of the sheer number of ppl that were drawn in and were focusing on it.
2.There were experienced editors making sure things didnt get to crazy, info had decent sources, filtering out crap etc
3. There were domain experts showing up from all over
So we get a constantly evolving real time decent summary of the subject. Strip away the real time aspect, which is really not a big requirement for most knowledge ppl look up, and it does feel ChatGPT is producing something similar as a wiki page. So in a sense it seems to have generalised the above steps.
For example, during the recent pentagon leaks I was watching that Wikipedia page evolve day by day. It was much more interesting and faster than any news org covering the issue. Plus it was quite diverse.
1. Cuz of the sheer number of ppl that were drawn in and were focusing on it.
2.There were experienced editors making sure things didnt get to crazy, info had decent sources, filtering out crap etc
3. There were domain experts showing up from all over
So we get a constantly evolving real time decent summary of the subject. Strip away the real time aspect, which is really not a big requirement for most knowledge ppl look up, and it does feel ChatGPT is producing something similar as a wiki page. So in a sense it seems to have generalised the above steps.