Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Shouldn't this argument be easy to settle with a simple citation search?

Step 1 - Rank papers by number of citations

Step 2 - Which of the most cited papers is the earliest?




One paper will be the most cited. One paper will be the earliest.

Unless they are the same there is not _one_ answer, what you get is an efficient set (the earliest paper with at least X citations / the most cited paper as of D).

And of course there is the problem of making the list of relevant papers in the first place.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: