All this science nonsense just got us all this mechanical horses that were unnecessary anyway and bigger explosions, who needs all that shit anyway. We keep believing this all leads to something, I’d say drop it all and go back to the woods.
Man, I don’t even know where to begin to counter all your unreasonable framing. Watson and ChatGPT in the same list, just dismissing chess and go as “transparent” (whatever that means) games.. just, wow.
"Throwing experimentation and modelling at problems" is really not on the same plane as "throwing GPUs at problems". Also because "trying" is part of the preliminary phase.
Please all this hard sell on complicated boondogles that will save us from the complexities of life. The concept of AI is as old of computers. Maybe older. People have been claiming we are just some form of AI since writing began. The turn of phrase may have been cast in anger and it clearly displeased people since it got downvoted to oblivion.
You can call it dismissive, but calling it ignorant is uncalled for. Producing the first half decent chatbot is not a good outcome given the time and effort put into this.
I think the poster tried to denounce the hype as a detrimental effect on the AI industry as search for actual solutions. Which may come from the confusion between the phases and outcomes of "Research" and "Development", where the "exciting" results of the "R" have created a fever on the "D" - also, since funding remains critical.
Man, I don’t even know where to begin to counter all your unreasonable framing. Watson and ChatGPT in the same list, just dismissing chess and go as “transparent” (whatever that means) games.. just, wow.