Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>They care about Linux.

They care about making money. Their investments in Linux are their future insurance policy from Microsoft, as unlike Sony or Nintendo, Valve only own the storefront but not the platform on which their games would run, and with Windows being their biggest customer platform, makes their survival completely dependent on the mercy of Microsoft and the potential dystopian scenario where, for example, on Windows 12, 13 or 14 you'll only be able to install apps through the official Microsoft store.

Linux compatibility was their only ticket out. It's purely a business decision, not a benevolent one.

Not knocking them for it, but it's good to keep in mind the reality and not blindly worship a for-profit corporation.




Sure, but Valve has done a lot for the Linux gaming ecosystem.

It also goes deeper than just Linux, and the Steam Deck is a perfect example of this. It's a real PC, and they allow you to use the device you bought as you wish.

Our incentives are aligned and due to how they operate it's likely that it'll stay that way for a long time.

As long as this is the case I will keep giving Valve my money and recommending their products to others.


Of course they let you have full ownership of the stream deck, since you don't have the ownership of your games.

They don't care what devices you use to play the games you bought on Steam since you're still tied to their platform.


Almost makes me happy that I have this (otherwise rather bad for, well, life) gaming habit, for allowing me to experience this rare case of capitalism working out rather nice (for two decades and counting).


Long-term self-interest is often indistinguishable from altruism. It is refreshing to see a company at least capable of that. That is as far as my blind worship goes ;)


By that logic Microsoft is also incredibly altruistic ;)


(Shrug) They brought cheap commodity PCs of incredible power to the mass market. Do you think that would have happened in a world dominated by Apple?


The logic that says it's possible for them to be the same?

Microsoft has that in certain areas, like Typescript. Not so much anything related to Windows.


Their interests align with my values. Being picky about the "why" of their interests especially when it is "they want to survive the crushing hand of Microsoft" is a rather rich criticism on your part.

Yeah companies want to survive economically. If they don't exist the products they make would be completely unavailable. It is a rather uninteresting angle to take.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: