No, I don't, but a working translation is proof that the theory does understand human language as it's actually used.
Or in this case, that it doesn't.
My view is: if you have a theory, it should be falsifiable.
If your "theory" isn't, then it's a religion.
No, I don't, but a working translation is proof that the theory does understand human language as it's actually used.
Or in this case, that it doesn't.