If you read that page, you’d understand that it was supposed to be “over-engineered.” I assume that you did read it, and took the least charitable viewpoint. I didn’t post it for peer review. It reflects my enthusiasm, as I was learning the language, and is probably four years old.
I'm a fairly decent chap, and have nothing against you. Not sure why it's so important to you to begin our relationship with an attack. I suspect we have far more in common, than we do, differences.
My apologies, I didn’t realize you were posting a link to your own site! I would have phrased my comment differently, although probably that should not have made a difference and I should’ve phrased it differently anyway.
And mine. I just get tired of the "Attack first" approach that everyone takes, these days.
I know that I sound like a demented old man, when I say that I miss the old days, when we all shared passions for the tech, and, even when we were in competition with each other, we tended to have respect for one another.
But those were also the days of the UseNet flamewars, so it wasn't all flowers and bunnies (and I was definitely a flame warrior).
I'm a fairly decent chap, and have nothing against you. Not sure why it's so important to you to begin our relationship with an attack. I suspect we have far more in common, than we do, differences.