Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No, he has not. "sql server" is just the product's name, it's not a generic category of servers.

We call the generic category "SQL Server" belongs to: database servers, or relational database servers.

No one uses "sql server" for something besides naming that specific MS product.




Fair enough. I still think it's hard to say how confusing it is to those not familiar with the brand.


I don't know about your culture, but I've never heard anyone use 'sql server' when they meant 'the database server'. You just don't call it that. I also think it's a pretty dumb product name. You might as well call a web server 'html server'.


People not familiar is Microsoft are probably not taking part in a discussion on HackerNews, let alone a discussion of why their SQL Server product was not ported to *nix.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: