> I really want to emphasize how insane this situation is, because I think most tech people won’t realize what’s happening unless it’s pointed out.
Count me in. If you asked me about the OCR itself, I'd probably say "yeah, it's mostly been solved for a good decade for print books and articles, but it's unreliable enough". I somehow never considered OCR might have gone better - possibly because my main exposure was through badly OCRed book scans and a built-in OCR in some PDF reader I used at one point.
It definitely didn't occur to me that OCR works well enough on arbitrary images, and it's cheap enough compute-wise that you could do it locally in a casual fashion.
Nice thing you have there in the Apple garden. Over here in Android land, I have the opposite problem. You say:
> This can possibly be the equivalent of “you’ll always have a calculator in your pocket” but equivalent analogy to memory techniques like spaced repetition.
and all i can think of is how I recently became convinced that a Samsung flagship is losing my photos. There's been a couple cases over the past few months when I felt really damn sure I made a set of photos of something (e.g. remodeled kitchen), but when I checked on the phone, it turned out those photos don't exist, or there is maybe just one where I expected 5-10. They aren't in the gallery. They aren't in the filesystem. Poof, gone.
So either I'm getting senile in my 30s, or something is off with the way my phone stores photos. I did a web search for this the other day, there are relatively recent reports on-line complaining about the same thing, but no one has any evidence. I'm thinking about doing an experiment now (basically make extra photos every day and document them in a paper notebook, and check after half a year if the photos match the notes) - but the point of me sharing this is: I no longer trust new tech, smartphones in particular, to handle basics correctly. Much less do something advanced like reliable text search on images.
There is a chance that your photos are being backed up by some cloud service and being removed from your gallery. The most likely suspect is Google Photos.
Note that Google photos not only OCRs, but it also does a visual search of objects, faces, scenery etc. and is extremely powerful.
> There is a chance that your photos are being backed up by some cloud service and being removed from your gallery. The most likely suspect is Google Photos.
I have Google Photos upload and backup both disabled.
But then, I'm pretty sure either Google or Samsung SMS app had a "feature" to automatically delete old messages (for a definition of "old" that was neither specified, nor configurable), and it defaulted to ON on my current phone, likely costing me significant chunk of my message archive (that I dutifully transferred over from the previous phone) before I accidentally found and disabled the switch.
So yeah, could be Google Photos deleting it. Or someone else. I don't trust Android as a platform anymore.
BTW. about this "delete old messages" "feature" - most likely this was implemented for performance reasons. But the thing is, you're unlikely to send or receive enough SMS in your whole life for it to take a noticeable amount of space. The irony here is, I do remember a case where the messaging app would become slow and laggy if you had enough texts stored on the phone - but that was solely because someone implemented the message list as a linked list, thus adding a O(N) multiplier to many GUI operations.
Count me in. If you asked me about the OCR itself, I'd probably say "yeah, it's mostly been solved for a good decade for print books and articles, but it's unreliable enough". I somehow never considered OCR might have gone better - possibly because my main exposure was through badly OCRed book scans and a built-in OCR in some PDF reader I used at one point.
It definitely didn't occur to me that OCR works well enough on arbitrary images, and it's cheap enough compute-wise that you could do it locally in a casual fashion.
Nice thing you have there in the Apple garden. Over here in Android land, I have the opposite problem. You say:
> This can possibly be the equivalent of “you’ll always have a calculator in your pocket” but equivalent analogy to memory techniques like spaced repetition.
and all i can think of is how I recently became convinced that a Samsung flagship is losing my photos. There's been a couple cases over the past few months when I felt really damn sure I made a set of photos of something (e.g. remodeled kitchen), but when I checked on the phone, it turned out those photos don't exist, or there is maybe just one where I expected 5-10. They aren't in the gallery. They aren't in the filesystem. Poof, gone.
So either I'm getting senile in my 30s, or something is off with the way my phone stores photos. I did a web search for this the other day, there are relatively recent reports on-line complaining about the same thing, but no one has any evidence. I'm thinking about doing an experiment now (basically make extra photos every day and document them in a paper notebook, and check after half a year if the photos match the notes) - but the point of me sharing this is: I no longer trust new tech, smartphones in particular, to handle basics correctly. Much less do something advanced like reliable text search on images.