Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why should Microsoft's ability to create a new revenue stream be more important than anyone else's ability to enforce their licensing terms?



You’re saying this like users of github copilot are out of the eq


The mafia used to steal dresses from New York garment factory delivery trucks and hawk them door to door in poorer neighbourhoods. The users (poorer households) definitely got value out of this by being able to obtain dresses they could not afford, but doesn't make a case for what the mafia was doing was right.


I feel pretty strongly that getting rid of copilot will slow down progress at a massive scale. Not only by affecting users who are getting a huge benefit from it, but by setting a precedence in how you can train AI


So ignoring licenses is perfectly fine as long as you do it:

a) at scale

and

b) make some other population happy

In other words, piracy should be perfectly fine, too, right? After all there are a huge number of users who benefit from it?


I’d rephrase this as “open source is open source”




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: