How are you a "creator" (in an attribution-worthy sense) if you are producing an unoriginal implementation of an old algorithm that thousands of coders have produced before you?
Most coding is not innovative, and that is the kind of code that these tools are producing and derived from in most cases.
> How are you a "creator" (in an attribution-worthy sense) if you are producing an unoriginal implementation of an old algorithm that thousands of coders have produced before you?
So your requirements are pseudo-code which you simply have ti translate. I see. No creativity required. Jepp.
> Most coding is not innovative, and that is the kind of code that these tools are producing and derived from in most cases.
I see what you want to suggest.
Then it woulnb't be required to learn on these datasets and simply build a "fair use" product which covers these cases with a snippet engine.
> How are you a "creator" (in an attribution-worthy sense) if you are producing an unoriginal implementation of an old algorithm that thousands of coders have produced before you?
If programming is nothing but translating unoriginal old algorithms, then you should train copilot on those. Nobody would complain. The fact that they don't is an unassailable proof of the unsurprising fact that programmers add value to programs.
Most coding is not innovative, and that is the kind of code that these tools are producing and derived from in most cases.