Please tell me, how is one supposed to engage with the "argument" that their personal experience and resulting belief is a "propaganda driven falsehood." That's not an argument, it is pure name calling, and doesn't even make sense as this person seems to be basing their beliefs on direct experience from their own professional life.
1. Not labeling people who disagree with you as “part of a professional managerial class” / people who don’t want to work (propaganda)
2. Actually citing personal experience (just saying you have personal experience isn’t a debate/argument)
> Not labeling people who disagree with you as “part of a professional managerial class” / people who don’t want to work (propaganda)
I see, you get to label others with pejoratives like "propaganda", but others are not allowed to respond in kind with labels of their own. Seems a bit one-sided.
