Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

What’s the reason that nuclear is so unreliable recently in France?



A bit of everything, 5 have been stopped due to cracks: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress_corrosion_cracking

A few are having their once in a decade maintenance check

Some are waiting for maintenance which were delayed due to covid

We didn't train enough maintenance workers because everyone was talking about shifting out of nuclear in favor of renewable (we're using American contractors now afaik)

So mostly bad decisions and poor management, it's a political issue more than anything else, it worked fine since the 70s to more or less a decade ago


You forget to mention a key point: these maintenance workers were on strike and they were also part of the problem.


Why were they on strike?

The lack of power suggests it would have been worth a significant bonus for them to work, if it was money they wanted.


At this point? It doesn't matter why they are on strike. They are always on strike.

Since WWII, the train company SNCF has been on strike -every- year. Except during covid because there was no train to be on strike from. Good luck getting a train for christmas, it's canceled. Same thing here. It's a crucial moment? It's very important for the french people? Go on a strike and ruin everything.

I live in France and I have no sympathy for these strikes. At least the Yellow Vests were striking on a Saturday. Everybody were pissed, but only on Saturdays!


Nothing is "unreliable recently", the mess is decade old, simply when EDF was private, after have acquired public made energy systems, they reduce investments to the minimum creating the present mess. Once the damage was so big they can't mask it again they left, leaving the mess to the public.

The public, who is abetter, have managed to push some excuses to avoid finger point any private friend and so reveal the mess all at once.


This is a made up history - EdF was never private, the state was always majority owner, by law limited to no less than 70% [1].

[1] https://www.edf.fr/en/the-edf-group/dedicated-sections/inves...


In the summer they had lots of cooling issues due to low water, if I remember the news correctly.

The article speaks of "ongoing or delayed maintenance, or corrosion problems" as the next reason for the problems.


They had to limit the output of warmer water in the stream because it was so hot already there was no margin left.


Short answer: Lack of investment caused by incompetent politicians, supported by public opinion. Lot of French are anti-nuclear.


Wikipedia says the plants are managed by EDF, a private company. Ordinary asset management would have prevented known problems, so there must be a few things that went wrong at the same time.


A "private company", owned to 85% by the French state, taking price policy orders from the French state, getting regular cash injections from the French state to not go bankrupt.


EDF being a public company owned by the state means that it gets hurt by two things:

* It has to make money, instead of being a utility that the state provides, so decisions have to be taken in accord with all shareholders.

* When it does make these decision, well, politicians have been selling off EDF piece by piece on the right, and sacrificing it to get votes from the green party on the left.

All in all, incompetent fucks with a 5 year foresight running it like a pawn on a chessboard, happily sacrificing it to get a meager advantage.


"Électricité de France S.A. (literally Electricity of France), commonly known as EDF, is a French multinational electric utility company, largely owned by the French state." - from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89lectricit%C3%A9_de_Franc...


Investment in what? The plant is still running, no? Do they need more plants, repairs to existing, or upgrades to existing? How do I dig further?


> Do they need more plants, repairs to existing, or upgrades to existing?

All of these... but no political will because "nuclear bad, renewables good".


Well, what is there to say given the state of Flamanville 3? Currently sitting at ~ €13 B compared to the initial estimate of €3.3 B. With a tentative start date for end of 2023.

All the while EDF is being nationalized. Should more money have been spent in even deeper pits?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flamanville_Nuclear_Power_Plan...


> Should more money have been spent in even deeper pits?

If we want electricity in a world without less fossil fuels, I'd say yes.

EDIT: renewable can't be the only solution. They are cheap only because they are built on top of existing nuclear/fossil solutions.


Renewables already fill that gap at vastly lower costs. Unless you specify that you're one of the about a million people living north of the arctic circle, then sure, do whatever you need.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: