Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That is a fair point. However, my point is not that the CEO should face consequences, but voluntarily take responsibility in some meaningful way. "That's on me" in a corporate email != taking actual responsibility. The empty platitudes are the problem. The accommodations for employees who are being let go are above and beyond, which is the silver lining.



> but voluntarily take responsibility in some meaningful way

Nobody seems to be able to explain what they think this looks like. "You'll know it when you see it"?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: