Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Why not allow alternative browser engines that follow strict privacy practices?

A few reasons for me, personally:

1) I like the consistency of all web pages being rendered by the same engine and having access to similar capabilities, no matter if it's a web-view inside an app, or in a browser.

2) Safari's a pretty great default for mobile devices, so I don't feel like I'm losing out by being "stuck" with it.

3) From a big-picture perspective, Apple forcing Safari on iOS is the only reason the entire Web client space isn't completely dominated by Google and subject to that—omitting some words I might choose to describe them, for civility's sake—company's every whim (instead it's only mostly dominated by Google)

4) Conveniently for me, I also happen to have no interest in having other browser engines on my phone or tablets, since this one's pretty good, and in some ways best-available, anyway. I have zero clue why I'd want another browser engine on my i-devices, and I've been doing this whole Web thing a while, long enough that I happily adopted and evangelized Firefox back when it was still called Phoenix—normal users have even less reason than I might. As in, I can't think of a single reason being able to install other browser engines would make my time using the devices better. Better battery life? LOL no, it'd be worse. Features I want? Nope, but several I actively do not want developers to even have as an option. I'd rather keep those capabilities away so developers can't start depending on them, so start forcing me to choose between using sites I want to use and avoiding things I don't think browsers should be able to do in the first place (I'm sad Safari's given up as much ground on this as they have, frankly, but again, it's only because of their i-device browser engine monopoly that they have any leverage at all here).

5) Meanwhile, this doesn't get in the way of my using the actually-important features of other browsers, they'll just have Safari's engine under the hood. Not a big deal, or even a small one (to me).



> 1) I like the consistency of all web pages being rendered by the same engine and having access to similar capabilities, no matter if it's a web-view inside an app, or in a browser.

Then use Safari and don't install another browser. Why should other people be prevented from installing other browsers based on your preferences?

> 2) Safari's a pretty great default for mobile devices, so I don't feel like I'm losing out by being "stuck" with it.

Then use Safari and don't install another browser. Why should other people be prevented from installing other browsers based on your preferences?

> 4) Conveniently for me, I also happen to have no interest in having other browser engines on my phone or tablets, since this one's pretty good, and in some ways best-available, anyway.

Then use Safari and don't install another browser. Why should other people be prevented from installing other browsers based on your preferences?


> Then use Safari and don't install another browser. Why should other people be prevented from installing other browsers based on your preferences?

Already answered in my post. A cookie for you if you can quote the relevant sentences.

> Then use Safari and don't install another browser. Why should other people be prevented from installing other browsers based on your preferences?

Ditto.

> Then use Safari and don't install another browser. Why should other people be prevented from installing other browsers based on your preferences?

Ditto.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: