Two years ago, when Twitter was banning right wing politicians (and left wing ones too), it was a private company that can do whatever it wants.
Suddenly in the past two years, it has magically transformed into a national security risk with global consequences.
Which is it? if the former, then they should be able to do what they want, including ban whom they want. If the latter, it needs to be regulated and certain rights ought to be enumerated for its users.
I don't know that anyone likes how moderation is ever done. If you try I bet you struggle to find folks who have ever liked twitter / the ecosystem for very long ... ever.
If twitter is a national security risk, it needs to regulated and not be a private company. If twitter is not a national security risk, then whoever owns it makes the rules.
Oh and it is all the fault of the Devs
https://twitter.com/SBF_FTX/status/1590774827467812865
If you stick your company name in your twitter handle - does that mean the company owns the twitter account too???